Anti-Sentimental comedy
Name: Rajyaguru
Ravi
Semester :
01
Roll No :
32
Paper No : 2
Enrolment No: PG15101032
Email ID : rajyagururavi24@gmail.com
Year
: 2015-17
Submitted To: Department Of English
Maharaja Krishnakumarsinhji Bhavnagar University
v Anti-Sentimental comedy
When
we discuss about the Anti-sentimental comedy, first we clear the idea about,
what is sentimental comedy?
·
Sentimental comedy:
This
form becomes popular in 18th century. Sentimental comedy is related to our
emotions. It appeals especially to our feelings of sorrow, pity, and
compassionate sympathy. It reflected contemporary philosophical conceptions of
human as inherent good but capable of being led astray through bad examples. By
an appeal to his noble to his sentiments, a man could be reform and set back on
the path of virtue.
Richard
Steele was pioneer of sentimental comedy and the best known sentimental comedy
is ‘The Conscious Lover’. In contrast ‘anti-sentimental’ comedy returns to
comedy of manners.
·
Anti- Sentimental
Comedy
An
anti-sentimental comedy is also called “Comedy of Manners”. When Sentimental
comedy did not last long,that time anti-sentimental comedy was created by “Oliver
Goldsmith” and “Richard Sheridan”. It is an artificial comedy, arose during
18th century. The dramatist of this period wrote plays according to middle
class family and their interest.
It
is kind of comedy representing complex and sophisticated code of behaviour current
in fashionable circles of society, where appearance count for more than true
moral character. Its plot usually revolves around intrigues of lust and greed,
the self-interested cynicism of the characters being masked by decorous preteens
Oliver Goldsmith’s “SHE STOOPS TO CONQUER” and Richard Brinsley Sheridan’s “THE
RIVALS”& “SCHOOL FOR SCANDAL “are from the Anti-sentimental comedy.
v Characteristic
of Anti- Sentimental Comedy
Ø Anti
– Sentimental Comedy:
Anti-Sentimental
comedy is reaction against sentimental comedy. The pioneer of ant sentimental
comedy is Oliver Goldsmith, who criticized the sentimental comedy in his
essay‘Essay on the theatre’ or ‘A comparison between Laughing and sentimental
comedy’. Oliver Goldsmith writes that the true function of a comedy was to give
a humorous exhibition of the follies and vices of men and women and to rectify
them by exciting laughter. Goldsmith opposed sentimental comedy because in
place of laughter and humour, it provided tears and distressing situations, pathetic
lovers, serious heroines and honest servants.
Sentimental
and Anti sentimental comedy is written by Goldsmith and Sheriden.The
sentimental comedy of 18th century was in fact reaction against the comedy of
manners.Sentimental comedy a kind of comedy that achieved some popularity with
respectable middle class audience in 18th century. Anti-sentimental comedy is
reactions against sentimental comedy.
Generally
the Anti-Sentimental comedy deals with the, and it is always focus on major
character as lover. And it is divided into subplot like the dramatic way and
the relations with the pathos.
So,
let’s discuss the Anti-Sentimental comedy with its characteristics .So here it
is AntiSentimental comedy.
1. The Rival
2. The school for scandal
3. She stoops to conquer
Ø
She Stoops to Conquer
This
wonderful comedy by genius playwright, Oliver Goldsmith, in its time ; Heal
ding the era of laughing comedies and being contemporary to other plays. The
story revolves around the family of Hardcastle and their friends. Goldsmith
brings out the comic effect in depicting this character, their foibles and
schemes and in which lend them in more troubles .in the very beginning of play in
the first scene speech by Mr.Hardcastle….
“I
love everything that is old ; Old friends, old times, old manners Old books,
old wine, and I believe, Dorothy , you‘ll own I have been Pretty fond of an old
wife ”
Though
not written by Goldsmith, the play's prologue is useful in the way it provides
insight into Goldsmith's purpose in the play. Obviously, the most explicit
purpose is to make the audience laugh. The speaker – Mr. Woodward, who would
have been portrayed by a different actor – comes out in mourning, already
having been crying, which in a way poses a challenge to the play. If we, as
actors and audience, are in a state of sadness, can the play lift our spirits?
However, most relevant is the state of affairs sculpted here.
The
prologue mirrors the trend in theatre that writers like Goldsmith was
desperately trying to change. At the time of She Stoops to Conquer, popular
theatre comedy was separated into what was commonly termed "sentimental
comedy" and "laughing comedy." The former was concerned with
bourgeois (middleclass) morality and with praising virtue. The latter, which
dated back to the Greeks and Romans and through Shakespeare, was more willing
to engage in “low” humour for the sake of mocking vice.
Woodward
suggests that a certain class of actor (and by extension, then, audience and
writer) were dying out as sentimental comedy became more popular. So
Goldsmith's play has an extra purpose: it must rejuvenate the joy taken in
“laughing comedy,” which could be willing to be more stupid, to dramatize base
characters and characteristics, and to mock even the characters who profess to
be moral. It's worth reviewing the "About 'An Essay on the Theatre'"
section of this Classic Note that explains in more detail the context of the
theatre of the time, since it will provide an even more indepth understanding
of the purpose suggested in this prologue. But even without such extensive
historical research, the prologue brings the audience in with a particular
question: can this play remind us that true comedy, which is willing to be
silly and unpretentious, is the most entertaining of all? Though in this play
Goldsmith presented image through the character.love is central theme, but for
money also. There are amusing intrigues and plans in the play, it is also
satirical one .
Ø
The Rivals by Sheridan
The
play is set in Bath, Somerset England in the mid-century and revolved around
two reach young lovers, Lydia and Jack, who reads a lot of popular novels of
the time, wants a purely romantic love affair. Lydia is enthralled with the
idea of eloping with poor soldier in spite of her guardian. Mrs. Malaprop is
the chief comic figure of the play.
In
the end of the play Jack is presented to Lydia by Mrs. Malaprop as son to sir
Antony and heir to his wealth, where he secretly assures Lydia that he is only
masquerading as sir Antony’s son so that he may marry her after that he meet up
with Lucius and gets in a quarrel with him and they agree to meet Beverly. At
the end, all secrets are found out at the duel because Mrs.Malaprop rushes to
the duel in fear for their lovers’ lives trying to stop it before it starts.
Lucius discovers that Mrs.Malaprop has been disguises herself as Delia and both
infuriated and embarrassed and leaves. Lydia admits her love for Jack and Julia
makes up with her lover Falkland. In the end acres invites everyone to a party
and they all go to celebrate.
Ø The school for scandal
Lady
Sneerwell, who in her youth was the target of slander, has set her life upon a
course to reduce the reputations of other women to the level of her own. Aided
by her intimate, Snake, she intrigues to involve the Teazles in scandal, to
bring Joseph Surface’s true character to light, to wreck the love between
Charles and Maria, and to gain Charles for herself along with Sir Oliver’s
fortune. To her the world consists of nothing but scandal and scandalous
intrigues, and she does her best to make her vision a reality. She is not
successful, however, when she abuses Charles Surface to Sir Peter Teazle’s ward
Maria, who refuses to listen to her.
Instead,
Maria trustingly confides in Lady Candour, whose defense of a reputation
ensures its complete annihilation. Sometimes Sir Peter Teazle ponders the
wisdom of his marriage to Lady Teazle, doubting the judgment of an old bachelor
in marrying a young wife. Lady Teazle is a countrybred girl who is enjoying
London life extravagantly and to the full. Sir Oliver Surface is concerned
about his two nephews, his problem being the disposal of his great fortune. Sir
Oliver has been abroad for the past fifteen years and feels that he does not
know his nephews’ real natures; he hopes by some stratagem to catch them
unawares and thus be able to test their characters.
One
day, Sir Peter and Lady Teazle quarrel because Sir Peter violently objects to
her attendance at the home of Lady Sneerwell. Lady Teazle accuses Sir Peter of
wishing to deprive her of all freedom and reminds him that he has promised to
go to Lady Sneerwell’s with her. He retorts that he will do so for only one
reason, to look after his own character. When they arrive, Lady Sneerwell’s
rooms are full of people uttering libelous remarks about their enemies and
saying even worse things about their friends. Sir Peter escapes as soon as
possible. When the rest of Lady Sneerwell’s guests retire to the card room,
leaving Maria and Joseph alone, Joseph once more presses his suit.
He insinuates that Maria is in love with
Charles and is thus running counter to Sir Peter’s wishes. Lady Teazle walks in
just as Joseph is on his knees avowing his honest love. Surprised, Lady Teazle
tells Maria that she is wanted in the next room. After Maria leaves, Lady
Teazle asks Joseph for an explanation of what she has seen, and he tells her
that he was pleading with Maria not to tell Sir Peter of his tender concern for
Lady Teazle. Sir Oliver consults Rowley, Sir Peter’s shrewd and observing
servant, in an attempt to learn more about his nephews’ characters. Rowley
himself believes that Joseph does not have as good a character as his
reputation seems to indicate and that Charles has a better one. Sir Oliver also
consults Sir Peter, who declares that he is ready to stake his life on Joseph’s
honor. He is much put out, therefore, when Maria once more refuses to marry
Joseph. Sir Peter, Sir Oliver, and Rowley plan to test the worthiness of the nephews.
Charles is, as usual, in dire need of money, and Sir Oliver arranges to
accompany a moneylender who is going to see Charles;
Sir
Oliver goes again to see Joseph. Still believing that his uncle is Mr. Stanley,
Joseph is showing him out just as Charles enters. Charles, surprised to see the
man he knows as Mr. Premium in his brother’s apartment, also insists that he
leave, but at that moment Sir Peter Teazle arrives and addresses Sir Oliver by
his right name. Both Sir Oliver and Sir sPeter are now aware of Joseph’s real
character. Charles, promising to try to reform, gets Maria and his uncle’s
inheritance as well. Lady Sneerwell is exposed by Snake, who is paid double to
speak the truth, and Lady Teazle returns her diploma to the School for Scandal,
of which Lady Sneerwell is president. Everyone is happy except Lady Sneerwell
and Joseph Surface.
To sum up:
These three plays are the best examples of the
Anti-Sentimental Comedy .yes it is form of literature and it has a own place in
Literature . These kind of Plays presented with Harsh Reality of Society and it
is also came with farcical elements and in this way criticise society in bitter
way .
To evaluate my assignment, click here
To evaluate my assignment, click here
Thank you for this great job �� Helped me at my exams
ReplyDeleteThank you so much...it helped in my eame... thank you so much once again
ReplyDeletethank you.. it helped my presentation...
ReplyDeleteThank you so much.. . It helped me for exam
ReplyDeleteThank u...it cleared my doubt
ReplyDeleteThank u ..so much..
ReplyDeleteTq so much it is more useful
ReplyDeleteThankyou sir! You solved my confusion about the 'anti sentimental comedy'.
ReplyDeleteIt is very useful for my study.
Thank you .
ReplyDeleteThank you very much
ReplyDeleteas a ba eng student this note very help full for my studies
ReplyDeleteGreat assignment
ReplyDeleteThank you.
ReplyDeleteUseful
Excellent job sr.
ReplyDelete&
Thank-you for the helpful information
Excellent presentation
ReplyDelete